5 Simple Techniques For constructive trusts case law
5 Simple Techniques For constructive trusts case law
Blog Article
لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
The court emphasised that in cases of intentional murder, the gravity in the offense demands the most stringent punishment, thinking about the sanctity of human life and deterrence for possible offenders.
4. It has been noticed by this Court that there is usually a delay of someday in the registration of FIR which has not been explained from the complainant. Moreover, there is not any eye-witness from the alleged occurrence and also the prosecution is depending on the witnesses of extra judicial confession. The evidence of extra judicial confession of your petitioners is tendered by Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram through their statements recorded under Section 161, Cr.P.C., on 06.02.2018. Both of these namely Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram occurred being the real brothers in the deceased but they didn't react at all towards the confessional statements of your petitioners and calmly saw them leaving, one particular after the other, without even moving an inch. They have not mentioned in their statements that the accused held some weapon when they visited them to confess their guilt about the murder of Ghulam Farid which could have precluded these witnesses from apprehending the petitioners. Their conduct does not glimpse much inspiring or natural. The petitioner, namely, Mst. Mubeena Bibi was arrested on fourteen.02.2018 and there is no explanation as to why her arrest was not effected after making with the alleged extra judicial confession. It has been held on countless instances that extra judicial confession of the accused is really a weak variety of evidence which could possibly be manoeuvred because of the prosecution in any case where direct connecting evidence does not arrive their way. The prosecution can be depending on the evidence of Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal which is equally fragile, as both the witnesses Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal didn't say a word as to presence of some light for the place, where they allegedly saw the petitioners jointly on a motorcycle at 4.
The convictions and sentences Upheld, as misappropriation was committed while in the bank and considering that only the appellants were posted with the relevant time .(Criminal Appeal )
criminal revision application is dismissed. reduced on the period of his detention in jail he has already undergone(Criminal Revision )
This is because transfer orders are typically viewed as within the administrative discretion on the employer. However, there may be exceptions in cases where the transfer is determined by malice, personal vendetta, or discrimination against the employee, they may have grounds to challenge before the appropriate forum. Read more
لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
Extra username and password are demanded for this resource. See Username and password webpage for details
9. Needless to mention that any observations made in the above order are tentative in nature and shall not influence the trial Court.
If that judgment goes to appeal, the appellate court will have the chance to review both the precedent as well as the case under appeal, Possibly read more overruling the previous case law by setting a fresh precedent of higher authority. This may occur several times as the case works its way through successive appeals. Lord Denning, first of your High Court of Justice, later from the Court of Appeal, provided a famous example of this evolutionary process in his improvement of your concept of estoppel starting inside the High Trees case.
In case the employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC may possibly dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer hasn't experienced a possibility to reply to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In certain cases, the NIRC might allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this will likely be only done if the employee can show that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. Within the present case, the parties were allowed to steer evidence plus the petitioner company responded to the allegations therefore they were perfectly mindful of the allegations and led the evidence as a result this point is ofno use to get seemed into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Read more
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
Persuasive Authority – Prior court rulings that could possibly be consulted in deciding a current case. It might be used to guide the court, but is not binding precedent.
a hundred and fifteen . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi So far as the stance on the respondents that pensionary benefits can be withheld on account in the allegations leveled against the petitioner, within our view, section twenty from the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does give for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension may very well be withheld or reduced. These consist of if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension could possibly be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a significant crime, their pension might be withheld or reduced. In some cases, a civil servant's pension could possibly be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions established from the government.